Back to The Arena
⚔️ THE ATTEMPTProposal Submitted2026

PathfinderAI

InnovaX 1.0

A proposed B2B2C recruitment and skill-verification platform that replaces static resume screening with adaptive roleplay interviews and job simulations, giving employers competency scorecards and candidates actionable practice feedback.

Engineering Role
Team Member
Sprint Duration
InnovaX 1.0 proposal phase
Team Configuration
Legacy Aurora
Outcome Status
Submitted
PathfinderAI
Agentic AIRecruitmentSkill VerificationCandidate FeedbackInnovaX 1.0
01 // PROBLEM DOSSIER

The Challenge & Core Problem

High-Level Briefing

The proposal identifies a trust and verification gap in recruitment: resume keyword matching can miss practical capability, while candidates often receive little guidance after rejection and employers have limited time for individualized assessment.

Formal Technical Problem Statement

"Design a scalable way for employers to assess role-relevant reasoning and workplace skills while giving candidates a safe environment for practice and constructive feedback."

Hard Timebox & Rules

10-day prototype window described for the proposed Phase 2
  • The proposed system uses adaptive, job-description-based interviews and situational simulations rather than resume keywords alone.
  • A multi-agent workflow is proposed to generate contextual follow-up questions and evaluate responses against employer-provided rubrics.
  • Speech-to-text is planned as a mocked demonstration integration for the Phase 2 prototype; the core workflow is text-based.

Open Risks & Pressure Factors

  • Candidate and employer needs must be served without making hiring decisions autonomously.
  • The proposal identifies fairness, data privacy, model costs, and safeguards against unbounded agent questioning as design constraints.
02 // LEADERSHIP & ARCHITECTURE

Leadership & Personal Contribution

Team Member

Contributed to Legacy Aurora’s PathfinderAI proposal for InnovaX 1.0.
The proposal defines a candidate and recruiter experience around adaptive roleplay, competency feedback, and skill development.

Real-Time Architectural Dilemmas Under Clock Pressure

DILEMMA #1
How can an assessment respond to a candidate’s reasoning instead of relying on a fixed list of questions?
➔ Action Taken: Propose an Interrogator Agent that selects contextual follow-up questions and an Evaluation Agent that scores responses against professional rubrics.
Engineering Rationale: The proposal argues that adaptive dialogue and situational decisions are needed to explore workplace competence beyond static tests.
DILEMMA #2
How can automated assessment support recruitment without taking consequential decisions away from people?
➔ Action Taken: Keep AI-generated scorecards advisory and hiring decisions under human control.
Engineering Rationale: Human oversight is a stated responsible-AI safeguard in the submitted proposal.
03 // SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

The Technical Solution

PathfinderAI proposes adaptive interview and job-simulation sessions that generate employer-facing competency scorecards and candidate-facing growth roadmaps. Candidates can also use the platform to practice without sharing a profile with an employer.

SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY STACK
Next.jsReactTailwind CSSshadcn/uiPython FastAPINode.jsLangGraphOpenAI / Gemini APIsChromaDBPostgreSQL

Data Flow & Architecture

The proposed LangGraph workflow ingests job descriptions, competency rubrics, resumes, and candidate responses. An Interrogator Agent generates context-aware questions and pushback; an Evaluation Agent compares responses with employer-provided rubrics. The system proposes separate outputs for HR and the candidate. Whisper-based Sinhala and Tamil support is described as a localization feature, with speech-to-text mocked for the proposed Phase 2 demonstration.

Critical Data Pipelines

[1]Ingest a job description, employer competency rubric, candidate profile, and interview response.
[2]Use role context and prior responses to generate situational questions and follow-ups.
[3]Evaluate reasoning against the supplied rubric and produce an advisory competency scorecard.
[4]Give candidates strengths, improvement areas, and tailored practice exercises.
[5]In practice mode, revisit weaker skill areas with bounded, progressively tailored exercises.
04 // RETROSPECTIVE

The Retrospective: What Worked & What Needs Work

What Worked

  • ✓The proposal identifies distinct needs for recruiters and candidates and gives each a separate output.
  • ✓It describes an adaptive multi-agent workflow rather than treating a general chatbot as the assessment.
  • ✓Human oversight, bounded interview turns, privacy controls, and bias mitigation are included as responsible-AI safeguards.

What Still Needs Work

  • ✕PathfinderAI is documented here as a submitted proposal; no completed product, deployment, or judging outcome has been reported.

Hard-Won Engineering Takeaways

01.Keep assessment grounded in employer-provided criteria and make scorecards advisory.
02.Separate employer evaluation from candidate practice and feedback.
03.Mocked integrations and proposal-stage architecture should be clearly distinguished from implemented features.
05 // DEEP-DIVE SPECIFICATION

Adaptive Skill Verification with Human Oversight

A proposed two-sided recruitment and candidate-growth loop

PathfinderAI uses contextual roleplay to explore candidate reasoning, then turns the session into separate employer and candidate outputs while leaving final hiring decisions with people.

Interrogator Agent
Contextual follow-up questions
The proposed agent responds to earlier answers with relevant follow-ups and situational pushback.
Evaluation Agent
Employer-provided rubrics
The proposal grounds competency feedback in job criteria and semantic reasoning rather than accent or demographic markers.
Candidate growth loop
Practice and tailored exercises
Candidates receive improvement feedback and can revisit weaker skill areas; sharing a profile with an employer is optional.
Human oversight
Advisory AI scorecards
The proposal reserves final hiring decisions and rejections for human decision-makers.
Legacy Aurora submitted the PathfinderAI proposal to InnovaX 1.0.

Explore More Builds Under Pressure

IEEE Computer Society R10 Summer School 2026 Mini Ideathon
SmartPark OGF
Predictive parking, fair billing, and computer-vision-assisted operations.
View Post-Mortem
The Oracle Challenge (Cre8X 3.0) | BCS Student Chapter, KDU
Smart Travel · Earth
Sustainable, accessible multimodal transportation for Sri Lanka in 2100.
View Post-Mortem
IntelliCon '26 Buildathon | AIESEC in SLIIT
The Passion Discovery Engine
Experiential career exploration for students navigating major education and career choices.
View Post-Mortem
Tech-Triathlon 2026 Designathon | Waypoint Group
Waypoint Dispatch Intelligence
Shared situational awareness for delivery operations.
View Post-Mortem
SDG Sprints 2026 | Stage 02
CivicLens
Accountable local services and stronger civic participation (SDG 16).
View Post-Mortem
SDG Sprints 2026 | Stage 02
DigiEdu
Accessible digital learning and reduced inequalities (SDGs 4 and 10).
View Post-Mortem
SDG Sprints 2026 | Stage 02
EcoChain Lanka
Circular material recovery, sustainable communities, and decent work (SDGs 8, 11, 12, and 13).
View Post-Mortem
SDG Sprints 2026 | Stage 02
SkillLink Lanka
Decent work and reduced inequalities for informal workers (SDGs 8 and 10).
View Post-Mortem